(For further information on spectroscopy, see:
http://speclab.cr.usgs.gov)
TITLE: Psilomelane HS139 DESCRIPT
DOCUMENTATION_FORMAT: MINERAL
SAMPLE_ID: HS139
MINERAL_TYPE: Hydroxide (Mineral mixture)
MINERAL: Psilomelane (Romanechite)
FORMULA: BaMn+2(Mn+4)8O16(OH)4
FORMULA_HTML: BaMn+2Mn+48O16(OH)4
COLLECTION_LOCALITY: Magdalena, New Mexico
ORIGINAL_DONOR: Hunt and Salisbury Collection
CURRENT_SAMPLE_LOCATION: USGS Denver Spectroscopy Laboratory
ULTIMATE_SAMPLE_LOCATION: USGS Denver Spectroscopy Laboratory
SAMPLE_DESCRIPTION:
"0-13. Psilomelane. Magdalena, N.M. (139B). "Psilomelane" is generally used as a field term for any poorly characterized massive ore of manganese. Much of the material originally cleared as psilomelane consists of mixtures of several different minerals, usually with pyrolusite (Palache and others, 1944). Psilomelane usually is of supergene origin, occurring typically as a weathering product of manganiferous carbonates or silicates. This particular sample has a black streak, and yields very little water (0.09%) when heated. Consequently, we conclude that it is composed in large part of pyrolusite. Its spectrum is opaque and spectrally featureless, due to the conduction band of MnO2 extending throughout this spectral range."
Sieve interval 74 - 250µm.
Hunt, G.R., J.W. Salisbury, and C.J. Lenhoff, 1971, Visible and near-infrared spectra of minerals and rocks: III. Oxides and hydroxides. Modern Geology, v. 2, p. 195-205.
"Many of the hard botryoidal masses formerly called psilomelane are now known to be a mixture of several manganese oxides of which romanechite is a major constituent. Some of the other minerals commonly present in the mixture are cryptomelane, KMn8,O16; manjiroite, (Na,K)Mn8O16.nH2O; and todorokite (Mn,Ca,Mg) Mn3O7.H2O."
Klein, C. and Hurlbut, C.S., Manual of Mineralogy 20th Edition, pp 317-318, 1985.
END_SAMPLE_DESCRIPTION.
XRD_ANALYSIS:
40 kV - 30 mA, 7.0-9.5 keV
File: psilm139.mdi (smear on quartz plate)
References: PDF2 #14-0627
Found: Romanechite
Comments: All peaks are weak, most peaks broad, and the alpha1-alpha2 components
are not resolved. The pattern has high background, probably due to Mn or Fe X-ray
fluorescence. Within the range covered by the PDF2 data, all observed reflections
were indexable as romanechite. There are some differences in intensity, however.
The PDF2 lists additional reflections which were not observed in our poor pattern.
Romanechite (Major), Akhtenskite(Minor)..Sutley April, 2005
END_XRD_ANALYSIS.
COMPOSITIONAL_ANALYSIS_TYPE: None # XRF, EM(WDS), ICP(Trace), WChem
COMPOSITION_TRACE:
COMPOSITION_DISCUSSION:
END_COMPOSITION_DISCUSSION.
MICROSCOPIC_EXAMINATION:
END_MICROSCOPIC_EXAMINATION.
SPECTROSCOPIC_DISCUSSION:
END_SPECTROSCOPIC_DISCUSSION.
SPECTRAL_PURITY: 1b2b3b4_ # 1= 0.2-3, 2= 1.5-6, 3= 6-25, 4= 20-150 microns
LIB_SPECTRA_HED: | where | Wave Range | Av_Rs_Pwr | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
LIB_SPECTRA: | splib04a r 3989 | 0.2-3.0µm | 200 | g.s.= |
LIB_SPECTRA: | splib05a r 5635 | 0.2-3.0µm | 200 | g.s.= |
LIB_SPECTRA: | splib06a r 18495 | g.s.= | ||
LIB_SPECTRA: | splib06a r 18507 | g.s.= |