Home | Galleries | Articles | Reviews | Best Gear | Science | New | About | Contact |
by Roger N. Clark
This review includes an analysis of noise, dynamic range, and full well capacity of a Canon R5 camera. The Canon R5 a full-frame 45-megapixel mirrorless camera. The performance is exceptional.
Contents
Introduction
Results: Canon R5 sensor analysis
Sensitivity
Fixed Pattern (Banding) Noise
Stacking Fixed Pattern (Banding) Noise
Dark Current and Thermal Noise
Autofocus Tracking Setup
Some Negatives
Conclusions
Final Comments
Appendix 1 Table A1: ISO 100 Sensor Data and Analysis
References/ Notes
Disclosure
Introduction
This review is under construction but the results are so fantastic, I felt they should be released now. The low level uniformity sets new standards compared to all other sensors that I have analyzed or seen analyses for.
To better understand the technical details of this review, please see:
Results: Canon R5 sensor analysis
Table 1a photonstophotos derived results
How to Interpret Digital Camera Sensor Reviews:
Sensor Noise, Thermal Noise, Dynamic Range, and Full Well Analysis .
Please support Clarkvision; make a donation (link below).
Figure 1. The Colorful Rho Ophiuchus - Antares Region in natural color
made with the simple astrophotography methods described here. To make
this image, I used a tracker with low periodic error, a stock Canon R5 mirrorless
camera, a stock camera lens. The incredible uniformity of the Canon R5 enabled
this image to be made with relatively short total exposure time and no measured calibration frames.
The R5 does very well at suppressing dark current, pattern noise is among the lowest
that I have measured, and the flat field was included in the raw converter lens profile.
This is a highly calibrated image and include the color correction matrix, color
calibrated workflow for natural color.
Gallery image with more details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Read noise Read noise pixel gain Dynamic Read noise
iso electrons DN gain e/DN Range this study
electrons
100 4.141 1.329 1 3.116 10787 3.71
200 4.757 3.031 1 1.569 4730
400 1.248 1.602 4 0.779 8949
800 1.67 4.287 4 0.390 3344
1600 1.591 8.112 4 0.196 1767 1.52
3200 1.537 15.78 4 0.097 908
6400 1.464 28.857 4 0.051 497
12800 1.464 59.714 4 0.0245 240
25600 1.474 121.095 4 0.0122 118
51200 1.434 233.941 4 0.0061 61
Read noise values in columns 2 and 3 above are from photonstophotos.net.
Dynamic Range assumes full well in DN is 2^14 - 2048 = 14336 DN
Read noise in electrons:
photonstophotos.net input referred read noise for Canon R5
Read noise in DN:
https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/RN_ADU.htm#Canon%20EOS%20R5_14
Derived gain = Read noise in electrons / Read noise in DN.
Table 1b Camera Data
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Camera introduced: 7/2020 Sensor size = 36 x 24 mm (full frame) Pixel pitch: 4.39 microns. Image size: 8192 x 5464 pixels = 44.8 megapixels. Offset= 2048 at ISO 1600 -------------------------------------------------
Sensitivity
Fixed Pattern (Banding) Noise
Table 2 shows the bias noise in image form. The pattern (banding) noise of the R5 is extremely low. I estimate the pattern noise in bias frames is less than 0.1 electron at ISO 1600! In a typical astrophotography scenario, measuring and stacking multiple frames, with dithering during acquisition, pattern noise can easily be reduced to below 0.01 electron without the use of master bias subtraction.
Table 2b. Apparent Read Noise, Full Image, sub-sampled | |
![]() | ISO 1600 Image Range: -10.00 to 10.00 electrons about the mean Full image statistics: min= 378 electrons max= 1390 electrons mean= 401 electrons ( 2048 DN) standard deviation= 1.59 electrons 0 pixels =zero (0.000000%) Pattern noise is less than about 0.1 electron! full resolution image (14 megabytes) |
Stacking Fixed Pattern (Banding) Noise
The typical scenario in astrophotography is to stack images to reduce noise, and also to dither (shift the field of view between frames or sets of frames). To see any residual fixed pattern noise 100 bias frames were randomly dithered by up to 100 ;pixels in both x and y directions then stacked with sigma-clipped average with clipping set to 2.0 standard deviations. Results of the stack are shown in Table 3.
The results of the 100 frame stack shows Incredibly low noise, and barely any perceptible pattern noise. Note the scale of the images: +/- 5 electrons about the mean (top image in Table 3), and +/- 2 electrons about the mean (bottom image in Table 3). Random noise has been reduced to 0.2 electron and pattern noise less than about 0.02 electron! This mean that just a few photons per pixel over 100 frames could be detected.
With such low noise in the stacked image, the tacking needs to be done in floating point, and the stacked output needs to be floating point if stacking linear data. That was done for this stack.
NOTE: other cameras reviewed on this site typically show the bias frames over a +/- 20 electron range. The lower image in Table 3 is a 10 times smaller range!
Table 3. Apparent Read Noise in 100 Frame Stacked image, Full Image, sub-sampled | |
![]() | ISO 1600 Image Range: -5.00 to 5.00 electrons about the mean Full image statistics: min= 400.39 electrons max= 402.52 electrons mean= 401.40 electrons ( 2047.96 DN) standard deviation= 0.20 electrons 0 pixels =zero (0.000000%) Pattern noise is less than about 0.02 electron! |
![]() | ISO 1600 Image Range: -2.00 to 2.00 electrons about the mean Full image statistics: min= 400.39 electrons max= 402.52 electrons mean= 401.40 electrons ( 2047.96 DN) standard deviation= 0.20 electrons 0 pixels =zero (0.000000%) Pattern noise is less than about 0.02 electron! full resolution image (9.8 megabytes) |
Dark Current and Thermal Noise
Initial dark current measurements show that the sensor is tracking the dark current of the Canon 7D Mark II. Dark current level is dependent on the pixel design, but includes a component that increases dark current with pixel area. The Canon R5 has 15% larger area per pixel than the 7D2, so there is an improvement of the R5 per unit area. Figure 4 shows the measured dark current levels of the R5 along with other sensors.
Autofocus Tracking Setup
Some Negatives
Conclusions
The Canon R5 is an incredible low light camera with very impressive low pattern noise.
Compare the incredible uniformity of the Canon R5 45 megapixel 2020 sensor to Sony's IMX455 61 megapixel sensor of similar vintage (2019) shown in Figure 2, top, here, Alarcon et. al., 2023. The kind of pattern noise in the IMX455 will not be improved by dithering, so a master bias is needed to be subtracted to fix the pattern noise. But the Canon R5 sensor does very well with stacking and dithering and no master bias is needed.
Even without dithering, stacking bias improves noise, and derivation of a flat field correction can be done with a flat field measurement and a single value bias level for all pixels (2048 for ISO 1600).
See my Canon R5 gallery for many examples illustrating what this camera can do.
Appendix 1
References
Alarcon et. al., 2023, Scientific CMOS Sensors in Astronomy: IMX455 and IMX411
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 135:055001 (15pp).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/acd04a
direct link to pdf
Notes:
DN is "Data Number." That is the number in the file for each pixel. I'm quoting the luminance level (although red, green and blue are almost the same in the cases I cited).
16-bit signed integer: -32768 to +32767
16-bit unsigned integer: 0 to 65535
Photoshop uses signed integers, but the 16-bit tiff is unsigned integer (correctly read by ImagesPlus).
Procedures for performing this analysis are described in: Procedures for Evaluating Digital Camera Noise, Dynamic Range, and Full Well Capacities; Canon 1D Mark II Analysis
Disclosure
Roger Clark is a B&H Photo affiliate. The affiliate links to a product simply allow the ability to buy the product for the same price as if the purchase was made through B&H directly. By using the link you support this site and enable it to remain active with new reviews and information. Please support this site.
Home | Galleries | Articles | Reviews | Best Gear | Science | New | About | Contact |
http://clarkvision.com/articles/evaluation-canon-7dii
First published July 9, 2025.
Last updated July 12, 2025.